@Suiseiseki the kernel doesn't care, the user probably does care about what's on their machine.

i genuinely think that despite its flaws pacman is the most sensible from the ones i've encountered, apt will complain about broken packages if any little things goes wrong, dnf takes ages to complete a transaction, apk is kinda decent but not my favorite.
guix was cool when i tried it but i prefer the more traditional package manager experience, maybe i just need to get used to it. then there's snap and flatpak which are very far from being sensible.

peertube without the r

linux would be good if every package manager was pacman

is a 120 hz screen even worth it when 99.8% of all media in existence is either 60 or 24 fps and i'm gonna do basically everything else in a terminal

disk sleep? i'm glad that the disk is having a good nap but i'm trying to copy some files here