This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
@sun@shitposter.world why not? It still makes a more transparent system than what legacy governments have come up with.
-
R ActivityRelay shared this topic
-
@sun@shitposter.world why not? It still makes a more transparent system than what legacy governments have come up with.
@ledocool@abyss.cafe @sun@shitposter.world because Discord is in power over the voting, and discord cannot be trusted, they have a track record of selling people out.
And discord is a terrible application, You really want them to monetize your vote? You think they would stop at emoji's, file size limits, themes? -
@ledocool@abyss.cafe @sun@shitposter.world because Discord is in power over the voting, and discord cannot be trusted, they have a track record of selling people out.
And discord is a terrible application, You really want them to monetize your vote? You think they would stop at emoji's, file size limits, themes?@xaetacore@neondystopia.world @sun@shitposter.world all the downsides you mentioned are still not worse than the governmental system. Swap out Discord for The Government in your own post to know why.
In the end they will probably change to something else. But I don't see this choice as any more terrible for the time being. -
@xaetacore@neondystopia.world @sun@shitposter.world all the downsides you mentioned are still not worse than the governmental system. Swap out Discord for The Government in your own post to know why.
In the end they will probably change to something else. But I don't see this choice as any more terrible for the time being.@ledocool@abyss.cafe @sun@shitposter.world Exactly more reason to make something that IS NOT CENTRALIZED, Discord is centralized and in the pocket of the government, if they want data and info discord bends over, they do this for youtubers can you imagine how voting would be influenced?
