Never forget that just 3 years ago people were justifying paying $20,000 for a jpeg of an ape
-
Never forget that just 3 years ago people were justifying paying $20,000 for a jpeg of an ape
-
Never forget that just 3 years ago people were justifying paying $20,000 for a jpeg of an ape
@cmconseils paying, moreover, not even for the jpeg per se so much as having an anonymous computer set a pile of money on fire adding a line to a public database, saying that exact jpeg (but not others visually indistinguishable from it) is the property of a string of random numbers that you can demonstrate (by setting additional money on fire) you have partial control over.
We have met the premium quality apes, and they are us.
-
R ActivityRelay shared this topic
-
Never forget that just 3 years ago people were justifying paying $20,000 for a jpeg of an ape
-
@twit_terrorist @cmconseils It feels deserved, because just like absolutely everyone else said back then, you deserve to lose all that money in such an embarrassing fashion.
I wonder how people are doing with all their Trump AI superhero pics. NFG's were stupid from day 1.
-
System shared this topic
-
@twit_terrorist @cmconseils It feels deserved, because just like absolutely everyone else said back then, you deserve to lose all that money in such an embarrassing fashion.
I wonder how people are doing with all their Trump AI superhero pics. NFT's were stupid from day 1.
