Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • All Topics
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "Publishers actually reuse ISBNs" is a horror which keeps traumatizing new librarians every so often
Welcome to Caint!

Issues? Post in Comments & Feedback
You can now view, reply, and favourite posts from the Fediverse. You can click here or click on the on the navigation bar on the left.

"Publishers actually reuse ISBNs" is a horror which keeps traumatizing new librarians every so often

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
5 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Eric PhetteplaceP This user is from outside of this forum
    Eric PhetteplaceP This user is from outside of this forum
    Eric Phetteplace
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    "Publishers actually reuse ISBNs" is a horror which keeps traumatizing new librarians every so often

    Brian FentonB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Eric PhetteplaceP Eric Phetteplace

      "Publishers actually reuse ISBNs" is a horror which keeps traumatizing new librarians every so often

      Brian FentonB This user is from outside of this forum
      Brian FentonB This user is from outside of this forum
      Brian Fenton
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @phette23 am I about to learn that ISBNs, like SSNs, are not actually unique?

      Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Brian FentonB Brian Fenton

        @phette23 am I about to learn that ISBNs, like SSNs, are not actually unique?

        Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
        Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T This user is from outside of this forum
        Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @brianfenton @phette23 ”The SSA projects that the current numbering system has enough combinations to last for many generations, specifically for about another 70 years, without needing to change the number of digits or reuse existing numbers.”

        cite: https://legalclarity.org/do-social-security-numbers-get-reused/

        So, not yet, but maybe in the future! Or they'll change the format of SSNs (e.g., start including characters or extra digits.

        Brian FentonB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»T Emelia πŸ‘ΈπŸ»

          @brianfenton @phette23 ”The SSA projects that the current numbering system has enough combinations to last for many generations, specifically for about another 70 years, without needing to change the number of digits or reuse existing numbers.”

          cite: https://legalclarity.org/do-social-security-numbers-get-reused/

          So, not yet, but maybe in the future! Or they'll change the format of SSNs (e.g., start including characters or extra digits.

          Brian FentonB This user is from outside of this forum
          Brian FentonB This user is from outside of this forum
          Brian Fenton
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @thisismissem @phette23 yeah I clarified afterward, I meant that there isn't a guaranteed one to one mapping of SSNs to people given SSNs, although there have been at least a few mistakes where a given number was assigned twice

          mkjM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Brian FentonB Brian Fenton

            @thisismissem @phette23 yeah I clarified afterward, I meant that there isn't a guaranteed one to one mapping of SSNs to people given SSNs, although there have been at least a few mistakes where a given number was assigned twice

            mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
            mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
            mkj
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @brianfenton My understanding is that it's possible to get a new SSN in the US, in which case there is definitely not a one-to-one mapping between SSNs and persons.

            If you mean SSNs more generally as in "mostly-numeric personal identification number generally assigned by a government entity" and are willing to consider international usage, then it's *very* possible for multiple people to have the same string of characters as their identification number.

            @thisismissem @phette23

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • R ActivityRelay shared this topic
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • All Topics
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups