Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • All Topics
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Caint logo. It's just text.
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "it fits a tech industry playbook to grow a business first and later pay a relatively small fine...for breaking the rules...
Welcome to Caint!

Issues? Post in Comments & Feedback
You can now view, reply, and favourite posts from the Fediverse. You can click here or click on the on the navigation bar on the left.

"it fits a tech industry playbook to grow a business first and later pay a relatively small fine...for breaking the rules...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
12 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

    "it fits a tech industry playbook to grow a business first and later pay a relatively small fine...for breaking the rules... Anthropic (is valued) at $183 billion."

    It's what I suspected: Anthropic did the maths on how many authors have registered copyright (only 500k out of the 7M titles stolen, $3k not $150k). Better than $750 per title(statue min)but...

    It's a fine for "rule breaking" not "you stole books, erase your model and start over with non-stolen goods"

    https://www.newsday.com/business/anthropic-copyright-authors-settlement-training-y85533

    Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
    Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
    Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    Not entirely clear, but it also appears to be a set fine? So authors in the pool get to fight over the total? Rather than "you will pay each author X amount" — it says $3000 but that assumes 500k authors file claims. Could be less. Anthropic doesn't care, they'll pay their fine and be free to steal.

    Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

      Not entirely clear, but it also appears to be a set fine? So authors in the pool get to fight over the total? Rather than "you will pay each author X amount" — it says $3000 but that assumes 500k authors file claims. Could be less. Anthropic doesn't care, they'll pay their fine and be free to steal.

      Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
      Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
      Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      actual filing:
      https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.434709/gov.uscourts.cand.434709.362.0_5.pdf

      Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

        actual filing:
        https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.434709/gov.uscourts.cand.434709.362.0_5.pdf

        Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
        Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
        Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱
        wrote last edited by
        #4
        This post did not contain any content.
        Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱
          This post did not contain any content.
          Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
          Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
          Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          https://bsky.app/profile/courtneymilan.com/post/3ly4fwpyfok2y

          CassandrichD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

            https://bsky.app/profile/courtneymilan.com/post/3ly4fwpyfok2y

            CassandrichD This user is from outside of this forum
            CassandrichD This user is from outside of this forum
            Cassandrich
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @susankayequinn Yeah fuck that shit. Everyone should opt out of the class.

            Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • CassandrichD Cassandrich

              @susankayequinn Yeah fuck that shit. Everyone should opt out of the class.

              Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
              Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
              Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @dalias I honestly don't think opting out of the class helps anything... this case is settled, I'd rather see them pay as much of that settlement money as possible.

              There's always other class actions that can be filed. There are *so many* companies that have stolen these books. So the question will be... what will happen with those? IDK but opting out of the class would change nothing. Might as well get authors some money.

              CassandrichD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

                @dalias I honestly don't think opting out of the class helps anything... this case is settled, I'd rather see them pay as much of that settlement money as possible.

                There's always other class actions that can be filed. There are *so many* companies that have stolen these books. So the question will be... what will happen with those? IDK but opting out of the class would change nothing. Might as well get authors some money.

                CassandrichD This user is from outside of this forum
                CassandrichD This user is from outside of this forum
                Cassandrich
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @susankayequinn If you don't accept being in the class you still have grounds (whether you use it or not) to make a case against them yourself, and even if not, you don't grant that their wrongdoing against you has been compensated and is a closed deal.

                If the amount were going to be substantial, I guess it's a matter of how much of a difference it makes to an individual author's life and whether that's worth it. But as expected it's really low.

                Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • CassandrichD Cassandrich

                  @susankayequinn If you don't accept being in the class you still have grounds (whether you use it or not) to make a case against them yourself, and even if not, you don't grant that their wrongdoing against you has been compensated and is a closed deal.

                  If the amount were going to be substantial, I guess it's a matter of how much of a difference it makes to an individual author's life and whether that's worth it. But as expected it's really low.

                  Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
                  Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
                  Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @dalias

                  well I have 91 works in the pirated dataset and I'm still probably not going to sue

                  And even if accept being in the class, it only applies to *THIS COMPANY*

                  if I decide I actually want to sue any of the other 5000 companies that used LibGen, I can do that

                  And the judge already poisoned this particular suit by ruling it's "fair use"

                  CassandrichD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

                    @dalias

                    well I have 91 works in the pirated dataset and I'm still probably not going to sue

                    And even if accept being in the class, it only applies to *THIS COMPANY*

                    if I decide I actually want to sue any of the other 5000 companies that used LibGen, I can do that

                    And the judge already poisoned this particular suit by ruling it's "fair use"

                    CassandrichD This user is from outside of this forum
                    CassandrichD This user is from outside of this forum
                    Cassandrich
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @susankayequinn My understanding (not a lawyer) is that the *particular suit* being ruined by the "fair use" thing is reason to opt out of the class and have another chance at it. With a lawyer who's actually been told to prioritize making the case that it's not fair use, and given leads to expert witnesses (e.g. mathematicians who actually understand what the model is) qualified to convince a court of that.

                    Is it possible to be in the class collecting damages from the piracy that took place downloading corpus from libgen, without that putting you in a class where it's been ruled that the incorporation of all your books into their model was non-infringing? These seem like two separate allegations of infringement.

                    I'm not a lawyer and I don't know. I hope someone who is a lawyer can help advise on this, tho.

                    Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • CassandrichD Cassandrich

                      @susankayequinn My understanding (not a lawyer) is that the *particular suit* being ruined by the "fair use" thing is reason to opt out of the class and have another chance at it. With a lawyer who's actually been told to prioritize making the case that it's not fair use, and given leads to expert witnesses (e.g. mathematicians who actually understand what the model is) qualified to convince a court of that.

                      Is it possible to be in the class collecting damages from the piracy that took place downloading corpus from libgen, without that putting you in a class where it's been ruled that the incorporation of all your books into their model was non-infringing? These seem like two separate allegations of infringement.

                      I'm not a lawyer and I don't know. I hope someone who is a lawyer can help advise on this, tho.

                      Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
                      Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
                      Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @dalias it's a fair question and I don't actually know the answer.

                      I would say I'll have a better idea when I can see the form I have to actually sign when I join the class action (I have 91 titles in the pirated database).

                      I need to look at the other suits that are already ongoing too — and I have smart friends I expect will be weighing in on this 🙂

                      Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱

                        @dalias it's a fair question and I don't actually know the answer.

                        I would say I'll have a better idea when I can see the form I have to actually sign when I join the class action (I have 91 titles in the pirated database).

                        I need to look at the other suits that are already ongoing too — and I have smart friends I expect will be weighing in on this 🙂

                        Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
                        Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱S This user is from outside of this forum
                        Sue is Writing Solarpunk 🌞🌱
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @dalias

                        this seems to separate the two

                        "Judge Alsup certified the class only for piracy, not the act of AI training, and as such the fair use ruling on training applies only with respect to the three named plaintiffs, not the certified class authors and publishers. "

                        https://authorsguild.org/news/what-authors-need-to-know-about-the-anthropic-settlement/

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • R AodeRelay shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • All Topics
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups