ls -a
-
This post did not contain any content.
Wait till they try
ls -laz -
This post did not contain any content.
Showing what’s in the cupboards & drawers is more like
ls -R
-
This post did not contain any content.
And whatmade tool might tell you how all this garbage appeared here if you forgot.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I like the
la
alias. -
This post did not contain any content.
Is -alR killed my parents
-
I like the
la
alias.ll
so you don’t even have to move your finger -
ll
so you don’t even have to move your fingerDoesn’t show dotfiles.
-
ll
so you don’t even have to move your fingerPS1=$(ls -a)
-
Is -alR killed my parents
Lulz, I tried that just to see the results. Either the terminal knows to not go crazy, or this fresh install is small enough to not take more than 5 seconds.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Barbarians.
ls -la
, for civilized people. -
This post did not contain any content.
man i just figured out DOS in the 80s i’m slow okay
-
-lah gang rise up
-
I like
ls -Ap
, the-p
option is convenient, it puts a / at the end of names if they’re directories.-A
is like-a
but doesn’t show.
and..
-l
is sometimes useful, but a bit cluttered and less readable (at least to me, maybe it wouldn’t be if I were used to using it) -
Doesn’t show dotfiles.
Depends on the distro how that alias is defined (if it is defined)…
-
That is true, but I would define standard practice like this:
ls -l
=ll
And
ls -la
=la
-
-lah gang rise up
-Ahl
here! Human-readable sizes and get rid of.
and..
!edit: format code so …! doesn’t look funny
-
This post did not contain any content.
I’m an
ls -alh
guy, myself. -
Do you mean putting the l before the a, or just the l and a flags in general?
-
That is true, but I would define standard practice like this:
ls -l
=ll
And
ls -la
=la
Yeah, fair enough.
-
I’m an
ls -alh
guy, myself.Human-readable? What, are you some kind of human?