Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • All Topics
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Caint logo. It's just text.
  1. Home
  2. The Caint Lock-In
  3. Lemmy Shitpost
  4. Has this happened to you?

Has this happened to you?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
lemmyshitpost
48 Posts 35 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mickey7@lemmy.worldM mickey7@lemmy.world
    This post did not contain any content.
    G This user is from outside of this forum
    G This user is from outside of this forum
    glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    wrote last edited by
    #15

    Nope, just got an email in my personal inbox and immediately cut off from everything

    mickey7@lemmy.worldM 1 Reply Last reply
    23
    • 𝔄 𝔰𝔢𝔫𝔱𝔦𝔢𝔫𝔱 𝔭𝔦𝔢𝔠𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔠𝔥𝔢𝔢𝔰𝔢Z 𝔄 𝔰𝔢𝔫𝔱𝔦𝔢𝔫𝔱 𝔭𝔦𝔢𝔠𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔠𝔥𝔢𝔢𝔰𝔢

      Happened to my partner, she worked from home 4 out of 5 days a week.

      The company also had a lawyer there. All her accounts were locked by the end of the call, so she couldn’t exchange contacts with colleagues she liked. They sent a box and shipping label for her notebook, but never mentioned the two 27" Dell monitors and the height adjustable table.

      Sucked at the time, but the gear they left us is pretty nice.

      ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      T This user is from outside of this forum
      T This user is from outside of this forum
      then_three_more@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      Lol got caught with her hand in the cookie jar?

      𝔄 𝔰𝔢𝔫𝔱𝔦𝔢𝔫𝔱 𝔭𝔦𝔢𝔠𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔠𝔥𝔢𝔢𝔰𝔢Z 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com

        Nope, just got an email in my personal inbox and immediately cut off from everything

        mickey7@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
        mickey7@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
        mickey7@lemmy.world
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        Just horrible. When I had to deal with people that I had to lay off or fire because they weren’t working out I would calmly sit down with them and say, “we need to work together on an exit plan for you”. I would then try to use my contacts to get them hooked up some place else and always give them a good recommendation.

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        23
        • mickey7@lemmy.worldM mickey7@lemmy.world
          This post did not contain any content.
          O This user is from outside of this forum
          O This user is from outside of this forum
          onslaught545@lemmy.zip
          wrote last edited by onslaught545@lemmy.zip
          #18

          Mine was just a zoom invite texted to me with just my boss, but I figured the jig was up when I couldn’t log into my work laptop.

          1 Reply Last reply
          9
          • S shalafi@lemmy.world

            Among other things, I was in charge of on and offboarding and buying IT gear. HR basically told me if the employee won’t return the laptop we just have to suck it up. I may be misremembering, but legally speaking, we gave them the gear, no matter what paperwork they signed. And in no case would it pay to so much as begin legal action.

            And no, we don’t want the monitors. Just not worse the hassle and shipping.

            FenrirIIIF This user is from outside of this forum
            FenrirIIIF This user is from outside of this forum
            FenrirIII
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            Most competent companies lock down laptops so that even if they didn’t return them, it would be a useless brick

            bizarroland@lemmy.worldB 1 Reply Last reply
            7
            • mickey7@lemmy.worldM mickey7@lemmy.world
              This post did not contain any content.
              NoxyN This user is from outside of this forum
              NoxyN This user is from outside of this forum
              Noxy
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              Yep. The invite was sent at nighttime the previous day so I didn’t even show up for it. Manager had to ping me on slack to get me into the meeting to get laid off while I was still in bed slowly waking up that morning.

              And I was so completely done with that company that I just broke out in laughter as soon as the call ended. Couldn’t have worked out better for me.

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              45
              • mickey7@lemmy.worldM mickey7@lemmy.world
                This post did not contain any content.
                softestsapphic@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                softestsapphic@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
                softestsapphic@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                It needs to be illegal to fire people who aren’t doing a bad job in the US like they do in civilized countries

                🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 K M M O 4 Replies Last reply
                24
                • mickey7@lemmy.worldM mickey7@lemmy.world

                  Just horrible. When I had to deal with people that I had to lay off or fire because they weren’t working out I would calmly sit down with them and say, “we need to work together on an exit plan for you”. I would then try to use my contacts to get them hooked up some place else and always give them a good recommendation.

                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  stoly@lemmy.world
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  That’s because you suffer the deadly condition of caring about the well being of others.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  16
                  • FenrirIIIF FenrirIII

                    Most competent companies lock down laptops so that even if they didn’t return them, it would be a useless brick

                    bizarroland@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bizarroland@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bizarroland@lemmy.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    None of the companies I have worked with do that. What we do instead is we disable their login, and we also make sure that the PC is encrypted, so that if they do not return it, they will, of course, have to pay us for it, and then they can wipe it and reinstall and do whatever they want to do with the physical hardware.

                    Most people just return the hardware. Actually, now that I think about it, I think only once did we have an issue with getting the hardware back and we had still ended up with the hardware back after like a nine month delay.

                    H 1 Reply Last reply
                    7
                    • softestsapphic@lemmy.worldS softestsapphic@lemmy.world

                      It needs to be illegal to fire people who aren’t doing a bad job in the US like they do in civilized countries

                      🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 K This user is from outside of this forum
                      🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 K This user is from outside of this forum
                      🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮
                      wrote last edited by kolanaki@pawb.social
                      #24

                      Montana is cool at least, in this regard. Only state that does not have At Will employment.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • softestsapphic@lemmy.worldS softestsapphic@lemmy.world

                        It needs to be illegal to fire people who aren’t doing a bad job in the US like they do in civilized countries

                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        mirshe@lemmy.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        That doesn’t sound very shareholder-minded of you. /s

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        18
                        • M mirshe@lemmy.world

                          That doesn’t sound very shareholder-minded of you. /s

                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          djehuti@programming.dev
                          wrote last edited by
                          #26

                          “not a team player”

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          10
                          • bizarroland@lemmy.worldB bizarroland@lemmy.world

                            None of the companies I have worked with do that. What we do instead is we disable their login, and we also make sure that the PC is encrypted, so that if they do not return it, they will, of course, have to pay us for it, and then they can wipe it and reinstall and do whatever they want to do with the physical hardware.

                            Most people just return the hardware. Actually, now that I think about it, I think only once did we have an issue with getting the hardware back and we had still ended up with the hardware back after like a nine month delay.

                            H This user is from outside of this forum
                            H This user is from outside of this forum
                            heyjoe@lemmy.world
                            wrote last edited by
                            #27

                            Ours wouldn’t brick the laptops, but we do have software on them that let’s us remote wipe them. They will do that if they dont get the device back in a timely manner.

                            bizarroland@lemmy.worldB 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • H heyjoe@lemmy.world

                              Ours wouldn’t brick the laptops, but we do have software on them that let’s us remote wipe them. They will do that if they dont get the device back in a timely manner.

                              bizarroland@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bizarroland@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bizarroland@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #28

                              Just in case it comes up later, since I assist in purchasing for the company I work for, what software is it?

                              N H 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • softestsapphic@lemmy.worldS softestsapphic@lemmy.world

                                It needs to be illegal to fire people who aren’t doing a bad job in the US like they do in civilized countries

                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                mechoman444
                                wrote last edited by
                                #29

                                My friend, who works as a license renewal and hiring manager at a large tech security firm, once shared something interesting with me. He said that when hiring under his company’s DEI standards, he sometimes had to bring on someone who wasn’t the strongest candidate for the role. The goal was to meet diversity requirements, but the tradeoff was that it occasionally meant hiring someone less qualified.

                                According to him, if a hire brought in under those standards didn’t perform well, it could be harder for the company to let that person go. The emphasis on maintaining diversity created extra pressure to hold on, even when performance wasn’t where it needed to be. That situation, understandably, can affect the rest of the team.

                                Personally, I don’t have anything against DEI. In fact, I think it helps reduce nepotism, which is a positive. But I also don’t think DEI always works out the way people imagine it will. Like many policies, it has both benefits and downsides.

                                The reason I bring this up is because I think it’s a slippery slope when governments start drawing hard lines about who can and cannot be fired. At the end of the day, what tends to matter most is whether someone makes the company money.

                                Take my friend as an example again: he’s only required to bring in $250,000 each quarter, but he actually brings in around $4 million. Because of that, he has survived multiple layoffs and has even been moved to different departments, simply because his performance makes him too valuable to lose.

                                I D 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • bizarroland@lemmy.worldB bizarroland@lemmy.world

                                  Just in case it comes up later, since I assist in purchasing for the company I work for, what software is it?

                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Natanael
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #30

                                  There’s all kinds of options like Microsoft Intune to corporate antivirus + data protection solutions

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • M mechoman444

                                    My friend, who works as a license renewal and hiring manager at a large tech security firm, once shared something interesting with me. He said that when hiring under his company’s DEI standards, he sometimes had to bring on someone who wasn’t the strongest candidate for the role. The goal was to meet diversity requirements, but the tradeoff was that it occasionally meant hiring someone less qualified.

                                    According to him, if a hire brought in under those standards didn’t perform well, it could be harder for the company to let that person go. The emphasis on maintaining diversity created extra pressure to hold on, even when performance wasn’t where it needed to be. That situation, understandably, can affect the rest of the team.

                                    Personally, I don’t have anything against DEI. In fact, I think it helps reduce nepotism, which is a positive. But I also don’t think DEI always works out the way people imagine it will. Like many policies, it has both benefits and downsides.

                                    The reason I bring this up is because I think it’s a slippery slope when governments start drawing hard lines about who can and cannot be fired. At the end of the day, what tends to matter most is whether someone makes the company money.

                                    Take my friend as an example again: he’s only required to bring in $250,000 each quarter, but he actually brings in around $4 million. Because of that, he has survived multiple layoffs and has even been moved to different departments, simply because his performance makes him too valuable to lose.

                                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                                    insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #31

                                    Probation period is commonly 6 months during which time it’s basically at will employment. This is the time to figure out your hire and deal with it.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • T then_three_more@lemmy.world

                                      Lol got caught with her hand in the cookie jar?

                                      𝔄 𝔰𝔢𝔫𝔱𝔦𝔢𝔫𝔱 𝔭𝔦𝔢𝔠𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔠𝔥𝔢𝔢𝔰𝔢Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                      𝔄 𝔰𝔢𝔫𝔱𝔦𝔢𝔫𝔱 𝔭𝔦𝔢𝔠𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔠𝔥𝔢𝔢𝔰𝔢Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                      𝔄 𝔰𝔢𝔫𝔱𝔦𝔢𝔫𝔱 𝔭𝔦𝔢𝔠𝔢 𝔬𝔣 𝔠𝔥𝔢𝔢𝔰𝔢
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #32

                                      Do you mean she got caught stealing? No. Just stupid startup bosses having to fire half their staff because they had to fly Europe to New York like every two weeks and buy new macbooks when they left theirs at the airport, among other things.

                                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                                      3
                                      • NoxyN Noxy

                                        Yep. The invite was sent at nighttime the previous day so I didn’t even show up for it. Manager had to ping me on slack to get me into the meeting to get laid off while I was still in bed slowly waking up that morning.

                                        And I was so completely done with that company that I just broke out in laughter as soon as the call ended. Couldn’t have worked out better for me.

                                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                                        chickenladyloveslife@lemmy.world
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #33

                                        My (small) company got acquired by a massive West coast tech giant and six months later all the employees (but not the executives and managers) of the original small company were laid off. This was not even remotely surprising to me, and would not have been even if any of us had been given any work to do during that six months. When my boss told me I was being laid off, I laughed and said “of course I am” which surprised him as apparently everybody else was massively shocked and upset. Which surprised me as I don’t see how anybody could have possibly not seen it coming.

                                        All things considered, this company was actually slightly decent about it, as they gave us two months’ notice and severance equal to about what we would have been able to get from unemployment. The severance disqualified us from unemployment, but at least we got the amount up front and we didn’t have to spend six months pretending to look for work.

                                        NoxyN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • M mechoman444

                                          My friend, who works as a license renewal and hiring manager at a large tech security firm, once shared something interesting with me. He said that when hiring under his company’s DEI standards, he sometimes had to bring on someone who wasn’t the strongest candidate for the role. The goal was to meet diversity requirements, but the tradeoff was that it occasionally meant hiring someone less qualified.

                                          According to him, if a hire brought in under those standards didn’t perform well, it could be harder for the company to let that person go. The emphasis on maintaining diversity created extra pressure to hold on, even when performance wasn’t where it needed to be. That situation, understandably, can affect the rest of the team.

                                          Personally, I don’t have anything against DEI. In fact, I think it helps reduce nepotism, which is a positive. But I also don’t think DEI always works out the way people imagine it will. Like many policies, it has both benefits and downsides.

                                          The reason I bring this up is because I think it’s a slippery slope when governments start drawing hard lines about who can and cannot be fired. At the end of the day, what tends to matter most is whether someone makes the company money.

                                          Take my friend as an example again: he’s only required to bring in $250,000 each quarter, but he actually brings in around $4 million. Because of that, he has survived multiple layoffs and has even been moved to different departments, simply because his performance makes him too valuable to lose.

                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          droans@midwest.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #34

                                          That’s not how DEI policies are supposed to be applied. You’re not supposed to just reverse who’s being discriminated against. DEI means that you consider equivalent factors and ensure that your hiring pipeline and methodology doesn’t improperly harm certain classes.

                                          For example, you have two new hires coming straight out of the same college with the same degree.

                                          One of them grew up in a rather wealthy household. Everything was paid for them. They could spend their entire time at college focusing on schoolwork and socializing. They graduated with a 3.5 GPA.

                                          The other grew up rather poor. They had to work multiple jobs during college just to afford food and rent. They really couldn’t study except late at night and during the occasional lull at work. They graduated with a 2.8.

                                          If you just look at the GPA, it’s clear that the first candidate is better. But if you consider the factors behind it, well, then it’s the second. That’s an impressive work ethic. It’s rather common for people like that to drop out because they struggle too much making ends meet and can’t afford to stay.

                                          A proper DEI policy should be fighting back against misapplied policies like hiring quotas. It should be recognizing additional qualitative and quantitative factors.

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                                          9

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • All Topics
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups