Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • All Topics
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Caint logo. It's just text.
  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. Wikipedia is under attack — and how it can survive
Welcome to Caint!

Issues? Post in Comments & Feedback
You can now view, reply, and favourite posts from the Fediverse. You can click here or click on the on the navigation bar on the left.

Wikipedia is under attack — and how it can survive

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
34 Posts 22 Posters 12 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I This user is from outside of this forum
    I This user is from outside of this forum
    interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    wrote last edited by
    #23

    Wikipedia is not at risk of being shutdown, the danger is malevolent editors bringing the culture war inside of it and destroying “truth”. While it would be great to keep wikipedia as it is, “they” are coming for it, wikipedia doesn’t get to be excluded from the war. For now the best we can hope for is that it will survive but the best we can do is save local wikipedia copies in case the worse happens. Which isn’t shutdown, but corruption.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • P psionicsickness@reddthat.com

      Paywall; DR

      K This user is from outside of this forum
      K This user is from outside of this forum
      knokelmaat@beehaw.org
      wrote last edited by
      #24

      You can read it if you add archive.ph/ in front of the link (replace the www with it). It really is a well written article. I also don’t like paywalls, but I like good journalism and as they are still figuring out a way to earn money on the web I also understand their choice for these types of strategies.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • L laranis@lemmy.zip

        Thanks for sharing this. Started hosting a local copy of several wiki sources last weekend once this news broke.

        Another commenter said downloading is missing out on the best part of Wikipedia, the ongoing editing. Which, while true, is also going to be a weak point.

        How many of those amazing editors are going to stick around when their full time job becomes combatting obvious right wing bullshit, when they have to submit gov ID to have an account on the site, and when common sense and fairness becomes a crime?

        Wikipedia was a high point for humanity. Whatever comes next I’d like to preserve a little piece of it.

        H This user is from outside of this forum
        H This user is from outside of this forum
        HubertManne
        wrote last edited by
        #25

        Honestly someone recently posted on the hisoricalness of jesus and the article seemed way different than a few years ago and I would say less accurate. Sorta wish I had downloaded it in like 2015.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • thingsiplay@beehaw.orgT thingsiplay@beehaw.org

          However I wonder how this would work. As far as I know Internet Archive have a “Library” status and rights in the US (and only in the US), which grants them rights to archive stuff and have it as download that would be otherwise not legal. That does not mean everything provided there is legal. So leaving the US could actually hurt Internet Archive or the users in the US maybe.

          I would be glad if anyone with more insight into this topic could tell me one or two things about it.

          P This user is from outside of this forum
          P This user is from outside of this forum
          Phoenixz
          wrote last edited by
          #26

          Fine, split it up in two versions, the US version and international version?

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • B This user is from outside of this forum
            B This user is from outside of this forum
            bufalo1973
            wrote last edited by
            #27

            Isn’t there a way to sync the copy to the current version?

            FaceDeerF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B bufalo1973

              Isn’t there a way to sync the copy to the current version?

              FaceDeerF This user is from outside of this forum
              FaceDeerF This user is from outside of this forum
              FaceDeer
              wrote last edited by
              #28

              Sure, but are any of these “don’t worry guys I torrented a database dump, it’s safe now” folks going to go to the trouble of actually doing that? They’re not even downloading a full backup, just the current version.

              You need to devote a lot of bandwidth to keeping continuously up to date with Wikipedia. There’s only a few archives out there that are likely doing that, and of course Wikimedia Foundation and its international chapters themselves. Those are the ones who will provide the data needed to restart Wikipedia, if it actually comes to that.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • PowderhornP Powderhorn

                Dear god, are we still using base 2 for file sizes? At least use TiB like a reasonable person.

                P This user is from outside of this forum
                P This user is from outside of this forum
                Phoenixz
                wrote last edited by
                #29

                Yes, we all do

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • B This user is from outside of this forum
                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  bufalo1973
                  wrote last edited by
                  #30

                  I don’t know but if there’s a way to get from WP only the history from a moment onwards, then it shouldn’t be that hard to update it.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • PowderhornP Powderhorn

                    Dear god, are we still using base 2 for file sizes? At least use TiB like a reasonable person.

                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
                    wrote last edited by
                    #31

                    I don’t remember which is the stupid “1024 bytes in a kilobyte” one but
                    745,450,666,761,889 byte is 745 terabytes, that should be 745 TB and that 678 should be what TiB is for
                    And also that entire 677.98 is a useless value, there’s nothing that is “677” about this

                    PowderhornP 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S steevyt@beehaw.org

                      Like, at least 7GB bigger.

                      despoticruinD This user is from outside of this forum
                      despoticruinD This user is from outside of this forum
                      despoticruin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #32

                      We need a drive that’s at least… Three times this size!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • H henfredemars@infosec.pub

                        Wikipedia needs to leave the US at the least. Billionaires and AI pose a threat to all humans, and Wikipedia is no exception.

                        Kilgore TroutK This user is from outside of this forum
                        Kilgore TroutK This user is from outside of this forum
                        Kilgore Trout
                        wrote last edited by
                        #33

                        Ang go where?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • I interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml

                          I don’t remember which is the stupid “1024 bytes in a kilobyte” one but
                          745,450,666,761,889 byte is 745 terabytes, that should be 745 TB and that 678 should be what TiB is for
                          And also that entire 677.98 is a useless value, there’s nothing that is “677” about this

                          PowderhornP This user is from outside of this forum
                          PowderhornP This user is from outside of this forum
                          Powderhorn
                          wrote last edited by
                          #34

                          It is if you just truncate! No one should do this, as I don’t recall the last time I saw such a textbook example of “rounding error” meaning “we fucked up while rounding.”

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • All Topics
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups