Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • All Topics
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Caint logo. It's just text.
  1. Home
  2. The Caint Lock-In
  3. Lemmy Shitpost
  4. Political discourse

Political discourse

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
lemmyshitpost
196 Posts 75 Posters 18 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T throwawaypermanente@sh.itjust.works

    Literal fascism and/or communism

    P This user is from outside of this forum
    P This user is from outside of this forum
    plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
    wrote last edited by
    #32

    I identify as a fascist communist that leans libertarian

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • J jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk
      This post did not contain any content.
      F This user is from outside of this forum
      F This user is from outside of this forum
      fridaysteve@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #33

      People need something else to focus on. When everything is politics then politics is everything and it’s stupidly difficult to get people interested in doing anything positive.

      N A 2 Replies Last reply
      3
      • P plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works

        Centrism doesn’t mean sitting on a fence. It means most of the time understanding that both sides are right and wrong at the same time, I often see the problem identified correctly but the solution that is prescribed is absolutely incorrect.

        Here are some centrist positions.

        We need to stop unfettered immigration, so closing the borders is great, locking up and kicking out immigrants who have committed legal offenses is good, and we should expedite that process but we shouldn’t be kidnapping or profiling people. We shouldn’t be giving economic assistance to illegal immigrants. I know it doesn’t happen at the federal level but it does happen at the state level.

        Banning guns won’t solve the violence problem, guns don’t kill people people kill people. American violence is caused by inequality and lack of mental healthcare. Solve that instead of taking guns away.

        We should have higher taxes, universal healthcare and stronger safety nets but also much less regulation because most of it is actually designed to protect the incumbent corporations. Free the markets as much as possible, but never bail out a single corporation that fails, bail out the employees.

        Increasing the minimum wage does nothing.

        Instead of relying on underpaid immigrant labor the US should stop giving cash and tax subsidies to farmers and instead directly subsidize their wages by paying the employees directly. This is my middle of the road solution, we should actually consider nationalization of farms. One of the few things where that could work right now because I think nationalization in general leads to terrible mismanagement. But farms are already inefficient, corrupt and mismanaged and also living on the government tits so we might as well.

        Justifying things as “scientific” when the science is social science and the results are not reproducible is intellectually dishonest, and is rampant in discourse about various topics nowadays. The academia brought upon themselves the mistrust they have garnered. This is good because universities have become job training centers and they were never meant to be that, so maybe we’re due for a little creative destruction.

        I could continue, but I got shit to do.

        BaroqueInMindB This user is from outside of this forum
        BaroqueInMindB This user is from outside of this forum
        BaroqueInMind
        wrote last edited by
        #34

        Everything you said here i agree with, yet none of this shit you said is centrist

        P I 2 Replies Last reply
        2
        • DiplomjodlerD Diplomjodler

          The enlightened centrism is strong in this one. No, the US don’t have a conflict of left vs. right. The conflict is between the right and everyone else. And most of the right are just rubes who think they being part of some kind of movement but in reality are just being fleeced by a bunch of grifters

          F This user is from outside of this forum
          F This user is from outside of this forum
          floquant
          wrote last edited by
          #35

          Not left or right, but above

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • J jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk
            This post did not contain any content.
            T This user is from outside of this forum
            T This user is from outside of this forum
            tippy@sh.itjust.works
            wrote last edited by
            #36

            T J yourmomstrashman@lemmy.worldY 3 Replies Last reply
            107
            • G greenshimada@lemmy.world

              Doesn’t directly bringing up “enlightened centrism” (I assume sarcastically) from a non-right position indicate disdain for centrism? That would be a conflict between whatever you are and both centrists (for not being where you are - right of you, but to them, still left of the Right) and the Right.

              Also, if you’re aware of the Three Percenters and their claim that only 3% of colonial America supported the revolution, it means that even if they’re off by a factor of 10, with 30% for the revolution, and 30% against, it leaves 40%, a plurality of people, who have the sentiment from this meme where they just want to be left alone and not forced against their will into a conflict that indroduces instability and violence to their lives.

              DiplomjodlerD This user is from outside of this forum
              DiplomjodlerD This user is from outside of this forum
              Diplomjodler
              wrote last edited by
              #37

              “Enlightened centrism” is not the same as centrism and yes that label is meant to be sarcastic. There are basically two kinds of enlightened centrists. One are right-wingers who want to avoid the social stigma of being far right. The other one are people who close their eyes to the blatant attempt by the right wing to destroy democracy and pretend everything is normal. That’s what basically the corporate media are doing.

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              16
              • G greenshimada@lemmy.world

                Doesn’t directly bringing up “enlightened centrism” (I assume sarcastically) from a non-right position indicate disdain for centrism? That would be a conflict between whatever you are and both centrists (for not being where you are - right of you, but to them, still left of the Right) and the Right.

                Also, if you’re aware of the Three Percenters and their claim that only 3% of colonial America supported the revolution, it means that even if they’re off by a factor of 10, with 30% for the revolution, and 30% against, it leaves 40%, a plurality of people, who have the sentiment from this meme where they just want to be left alone and not forced against their will into a conflict that indroduces instability and violence to their lives.

                C This user is from outside of this forum
                C This user is from outside of this forum
                chuckleslord@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by
                #38

                Letter from Birmingham Jail, MLK Jr.

                1 Reply Last reply
                7
                • DiplomjodlerD Diplomjodler

                  The enlightened centrism is strong in this one. No, the US don’t have a conflict of left vs. right. The conflict is between the right and everyone else. And most of the right are just rubes who think they being part of some kind of movement but in reality are just being fleeced by a bunch of grifters

                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                  kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  wrote last edited by
                  #39

                  Not just the right vs. everyone else, the right vs. everyone. The right is also fighting itself.

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  23
                  • F fridaysteve@lemmy.world

                    People need something else to focus on. When everything is politics then politics is everything and it’s stupidly difficult to get people interested in doing anything positive.

                    N This user is from outside of this forum
                    N This user is from outside of this forum
                    NoneOfUrBusiness
                    wrote last edited by
                    #40

                    I mean, everything is politics whether anybody likes it or not, because politics is just what you get when you have a hierarchical power structure.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    6
                    • J jaupsinluggies@feddit.uk

                      That’s still an oversimplification. In reality political opinion varies across a spectrum; it’s not just hard left, hard right, or no opinion. My own views for example are a little left of centre with a leaning towards liberty (i.e. away from authoritarian). So of course I get called a nazi by the hard left, and a tankie by the hard right, both of which are utter nonsense.

                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
                      wrote last edited by
                      #41

                      You’re not wrong. But in your meme you painted all the people calling for civil war as extremes when for a while it was a pretty average sentiment among the right for decades. They were just doing it more quietly twenty years ago

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      10
                      • thedemonbuer@lemmy.worldT thedemonbuer@lemmy.world

                        If you think the next US civil war will be fought between Nazis and Marxist-Leninists, you don’t understand American politics very well. The US in 2025 isn’t Stalingrad in 1942.

                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                        NoneOfUrBusiness
                        wrote last edited by
                        #42

                        Nitpick: They’re Marxist-Leninists, not Marxism-Leninists.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • P plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works

                          I’m open to changing my mind, but you need proof rather than just saying that I’m incorrect. I have yet to see compelling evidence that raising minimum wage makes any difference at all in the long term. A lot of studies have been made to prove that it doesn’t cause job loss but none that prove that it changes the levels of inequality or pulls people out of poverty in real economic terms.

                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          NoneOfUrBusiness
                          wrote last edited by noneofurbusiness@fedia.io
                          #43

                          Proof: It’s literally what the Mexican government did in 2018-2024. Lifted millions of people out of poverty even as the economy mostly remained the same and/or shrunk. See: https://apnews.com/article/poverty-mexico-president-andres-manuel-lopez-obrador-social-welfare-c7ec7f184ce8163e84fffa1b9f47aed8

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • P plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works

                            Centrism doesn’t mean sitting on a fence. It means most of the time understanding that both sides are right and wrong at the same time, I often see the problem identified correctly but the solution that is prescribed is absolutely incorrect.

                            Here are some centrist positions.

                            We need to stop unfettered immigration, so closing the borders is great, locking up and kicking out immigrants who have committed legal offenses is good, and we should expedite that process but we shouldn’t be kidnapping or profiling people. We shouldn’t be giving economic assistance to illegal immigrants. I know it doesn’t happen at the federal level but it does happen at the state level.

                            Banning guns won’t solve the violence problem, guns don’t kill people people kill people. American violence is caused by inequality and lack of mental healthcare. Solve that instead of taking guns away.

                            We should have higher taxes, universal healthcare and stronger safety nets but also much less regulation because most of it is actually designed to protect the incumbent corporations. Free the markets as much as possible, but never bail out a single corporation that fails, bail out the employees.

                            Increasing the minimum wage does nothing.

                            Instead of relying on underpaid immigrant labor the US should stop giving cash and tax subsidies to farmers and instead directly subsidize their wages by paying the employees directly. This is my middle of the road solution, we should actually consider nationalization of farms. One of the few things where that could work right now because I think nationalization in general leads to terrible mismanagement. But farms are already inefficient, corrupt and mismanaged and also living on the government tits so we might as well.

                            Justifying things as “scientific” when the science is social science and the results are not reproducible is intellectually dishonest, and is rampant in discourse about various topics nowadays. The academia brought upon themselves the mistrust they have garnered. This is good because universities have become job training centers and they were never meant to be that, so maybe we’re due for a little creative destruction.

                            I could continue, but I got shit to do.

                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            NoneOfUrBusiness
                            wrote last edited by
                            #44

                            We need to stop unfettered immigration, so closing the borders is great, locking up and kicking out immigrants who have committed legal offenses is good, and we should expedite that process but we shouldn’t be kidnapping or profiling people.

                            This is literally what modern fascism is made of. It always starts with “expediting the process” and “immigrants who committed legal offenses,” but these terms are so malleable that you will relatively soon end up at the kidnapping and profiling stage. And let’s not get into how so-called “unfettered immigration” (which is actually pretty fettered when you look at the process) harms exactly nobody if handled properly, as many examples (e.g. Germany) show.

                            but also much less regulation because most of it is actually designed to protect the incumbent corporations.

                            What kind of regulation do you want gone?

                            Justifying things as “scientific” when the science is social science and the results are not reproducible is intellectually dishonest, and is rampant in discourse about various topics nowadays.

                            Social science is science and underpins many aspects of modern society such as urban design. Do you have an example of this in action?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            7
                            • F This user is from outside of this forum
                              F This user is from outside of this forum
                              fridaysteve@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #45

                              And this is what I mean. Everything is very much not politics but if you politicize everything then by definition it becomes so. People need to stop doing that.

                              N 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F fridaysteve@lemmy.world

                                And this is what I mean. Everything is very much not politics but if you politicize everything then by definition it becomes so. People need to stop doing that.

                                N This user is from outside of this forum
                                N This user is from outside of this forum
                                NoneOfUrBusiness
                                wrote last edited by
                                #46

                                What’s an example of something that’s not politics but is politicized?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                6
                                • F This user is from outside of this forum
                                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                                  fridaysteve@lemmy.world
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #47

                                  You’ve already asserted that there are no valid answers to that question. Why did you bother asking?

                                  N 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works

                                    Centrism doesn’t mean sitting on a fence. It means most of the time understanding that both sides are right and wrong at the same time, I often see the problem identified correctly but the solution that is prescribed is absolutely incorrect.

                                    Here are some centrist positions.

                                    We need to stop unfettered immigration, so closing the borders is great, locking up and kicking out immigrants who have committed legal offenses is good, and we should expedite that process but we shouldn’t be kidnapping or profiling people. We shouldn’t be giving economic assistance to illegal immigrants. I know it doesn’t happen at the federal level but it does happen at the state level.

                                    Banning guns won’t solve the violence problem, guns don’t kill people people kill people. American violence is caused by inequality and lack of mental healthcare. Solve that instead of taking guns away.

                                    We should have higher taxes, universal healthcare and stronger safety nets but also much less regulation because most of it is actually designed to protect the incumbent corporations. Free the markets as much as possible, but never bail out a single corporation that fails, bail out the employees.

                                    Increasing the minimum wage does nothing.

                                    Instead of relying on underpaid immigrant labor the US should stop giving cash and tax subsidies to farmers and instead directly subsidize their wages by paying the employees directly. This is my middle of the road solution, we should actually consider nationalization of farms. One of the few things where that could work right now because I think nationalization in general leads to terrible mismanagement. But farms are already inefficient, corrupt and mismanaged and also living on the government tits so we might as well.

                                    Justifying things as “scientific” when the science is social science and the results are not reproducible is intellectually dishonest, and is rampant in discourse about various topics nowadays. The academia brought upon themselves the mistrust they have garnered. This is good because universities have become job training centers and they were never meant to be that, so maybe we’re due for a little creative destruction.

                                    I could continue, but I got shit to do.

                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tippy@sh.itjust.works
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #48

                                    So you’re leaving the US, considering you’re an illegal immigrant here right? I mean, unless you’re indigenous it seems pretty illegal for you to claim any right to live here and boot others out. See the issue with saying people are illegal?

                                    “Living on the governments tit” is straight up right-winger bullshit. We pay taxes, why the fuck should the government hoard that money and use it on shit that doesn’t benefit the people? That is the ENTIRE FUCKING POINT of a government, to pool resources and skills to better society as a whole.

                                    You think science is bullshit and that higher education should be “creatively” destroyed. How you think that isn’t fascism is some serious mental gymnastics.

                                    You could continue, but you know your viewpoint is hard right and you’re too cowardly to stick around and defend your bullshit because your fragile fee-fees will be hurt.

                                    N P 2 Replies Last reply
                                    12
                                    • F fridaysteve@lemmy.world

                                      You’ve already asserted that there are no valid answers to that question. Why did you bother asking?

                                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      NoneOfUrBusiness
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #49

                                      Because either you’ll cite a good example and prove me wrong, or you’ll cite a bad example and confirm I’m right. While I doubt you’ll be convinced in the latter case, someone reading this exchange might be, so there’s value to be had in either case.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      6
                                      • F This user is from outside of this forum
                                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                                        fridaysteve@lemmy.world
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #50

                                        You’ve already asserted that everything is politics whether I like it or not, including this conversation, and since I don’t get involved in “prove me wrong” political conversations on the internet I’ll just exit.

                                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F FistingEnthusiast

                                          This is bullshit

                                          Trying to pretend that there’s a concerted far-left effort to create civil war in 'Murica is patently absurd

                                          Sure, there may be a handful of nutters, but they pale in comparison to the number of far-right who are actively lusting for the blood of the people they hate and fear

                                          T This user is from outside of this forum
                                          T This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tidderuuf@lemmy.world
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #51

                                          Wasn’t there a movement to have the western states cecede after the last 2 Trump wins?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • All Topics
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups