Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • All Topics
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Home
  2. Funny
  3. Never Forget
Welcome to Caint!

Issues? Post in Comments & Feedback
You can now view, reply, and favourite posts from the Fediverse. You can click here or click on the on the navigation bar on the left.

Never Forget

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Funny
funny
39 Posts 30 Posters 4 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • carbonicedragon@pawb.socialC carbonicedragon@pawb.social

    Was it even the rights, in a legal sense? I thought it was just a digital receipt of sorts that just links to the jpeg, which isn’t necessary the same thing as including control of the IP?

    S This user is from outside of this forum
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    No, there’s no transfer of copyright ownership, it’s merely proof that you own the token on a given blockchain for that JPEG. You don’t get any additional rights to the JPEG vs anyone else, just the ownership of the token. So people can verify that you own the token, and that’s about it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    10
    • D denial@feddit.org

      And it wasn’t a jpeg. It was a link to a jpeg.

      P This user is from outside of this forum
      P This user is from outside of this forum
      pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      And half of those links don’t even work any more, as the businesses went bust.

      So they paid $20k for a string of text that leads to nothing.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      31
      • M mtk@lemmy.world

        I know someone who bought an nft of a house in the meta verse(???) It was really hard not to laugh at his face. I did tell them it was stupid, just nicely

        C This user is from outside of this forum
        C This user is from outside of this forum
        crank0271@lemmy.world
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        “You imbecile 🤗”

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        12
        • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
          This post did not contain any content.
          D This user is from outside of this forum
          D This user is from outside of this forum
          daddledew@lemmy.world
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          I can’t wait to watch the Internet Historian video about this.

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          7
          • C crank0271@lemmy.world

            “You imbecile 🤗”

            P This user is from outside of this forum
            P This user is from outside of this forum
            p00ptart@lemmy.world
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            Sweet summer child, bless your soul.

            1 Reply Last reply
            7
            • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
              This post did not contain any content.
              E This user is from outside of this forum
              E This user is from outside of this forum
              entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              wrote last edited by entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              #16

              That was really just a stress test. They needed to see if the intelligence level had dropped below the trump line.

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              12
              • D denial@feddit.org

                And it wasn’t a jpeg. It was a link to a jpeg.

                R This user is from outside of this forum
                R This user is from outside of this forum
                rusty@lemmy.ca
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                1 Reply Last reply
                41
                • D daddledew@lemmy.world

                  I can’t wait to watch the Internet Historian video about this.

                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  plenipotentprotogod@lemmy.world
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  It’s not quite the same tone as internet historian, but if you’re looking for an entertaining takedown of NFTs, I highly recommend Line Goes Up by Folding Ideas.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  11
                  • T texasdrunk@lemmy.world

                    I actually assumed it would take the place of art for money laundering.

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    sgforce@lemmy.ca
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    It was for about 6 months

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    6
                    • D drewmeister@lemmy.world

                      I tend to not get excited about the hot new thing in tech. Sometimes the thing has legs, like crypto-currency or LLM chatbots (probably), and sometimes it doesn’t, like metaverse or NFTs. But I work in tech, so I know a lot of people - am friends with some people - that tell me that the thing is the future and that I need to get in on it, too. Of all the fads that didn’t pan out, NFTs was the most satisfying to watch crash and burn.

                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      plenipotentprotogod@lemmy.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      That reminds me, we should also never forget that around the same time Mark Zuckerberg got so deep into Metaverse hype that he renamed his company after it and sunk 10s of billions of dollars into development with nothing to show for it

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • E entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                        That was really just a stress test. They needed to see if the intelligence level had dropped below the trump line.

                        J This user is from outside of this forum
                        J This user is from outside of this forum
                        jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        Heh. Maybe “the trump line” should become slang, like the mendoza line

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
                          This post did not contain any content.
                          E This user is from outside of this forum
                          E This user is from outside of this forum
                          etterra@discuss.online
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          Yeah, and I laughed at their stupidity the whole time. There was only ever one potential use case for NFTs (paying the artist) and it was immediately trampled by herds of gullible morons trying to make a quick buck.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          10
                          • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
                            This post did not contain any content.
                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            Was anybody actually paying $500 though? It’s impossible to know but I think a majority of the sales were back to the seller to pump up the price, launder money, dodge taxes etc. There probably weren’t that many people actually paying 20k for these links.

                            A lot of very dark money got moved around though, which is really the only use case for crypto in general.

                            L chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comC 2 Replies Last reply
                            8
                            • S sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works

                              For the last time, it wasn’t $20k/$500k for a JPEG, it was for the rights to a jpeg. Everyone can see and use the JPEG, but only you could prove you owned it.

                              R This user is from outside of this forum
                              R This user is from outside of this forum
                              Rothe
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              No it was never for the rights, and it was never for the jpeg. It was for a link to a jpeg which you didn’t own.

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              4
                              • N not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                                Was anybody actually paying $500 though? It’s impossible to know but I think a majority of the sales were back to the seller to pump up the price, launder money, dodge taxes etc. There probably weren’t that many people actually paying 20k for these links.

                                A lot of very dark money got moved around though, which is really the only use case for crypto in general.

                                L This user is from outside of this forum
                                L This user is from outside of this forum
                                Kairos
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                500k

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                4
                                • P pulsewidth@lemmy.world

                                  And half of those links don’t even work any more, as the businesses went bust.

                                  So they paid $20k for a string of text that leads to nothing.

                                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Johanno
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #26

                                  And people copied it as soon they had the link.

                                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                                  4
                                  • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
                                    This post did not contain any content.
                                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                                    arkthos@pawb.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #27

                                    Nfts were funny. Beyond the JPEG stupidity they were all just a solution that was so desperately searching for a problem to solve, and every time it turned out to be a massively more expensive way of doing things we can already do without nfts.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    11
                                    • S sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works

                                      For the last time, it wasn’t $20k/$500k for a JPEG, it was for the rights to a jpeg. Everyone can see and use the JPEG, but only you could prove you owned it.

                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      arkthos@pawb.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #28

                                      You could prove you had a link to a JPEG. Whether that link says you own it is up to interpretation.

                                      Also I could upload that same image to another IPFS node and create a new link to that on the Blockchain.

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                                        Was anybody actually paying $500 though? It’s impossible to know but I think a majority of the sales were back to the seller to pump up the price, launder money, dodge taxes etc. There probably weren’t that many people actually paying 20k for these links.

                                        A lot of very dark money got moved around though, which is really the only use case for crypto in general.

                                        chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #29

                                        Don’t count out gambling. NFTs are a gambling game, where you win if you aren’t the last one holding the bag. There’s no hard guarantee that the traffic for a given NFT is real or not, but if its origin is something scarce and noteworthy (like being minted by the subject of a popular meme) then that can be a Schelling point for gamblers to converge on and reasonably conclude that other gamblers will be trying for the same NFT.

                                        At some point the game ends when sources of new players are exhausted and everyone stops playing, but at one point I believe people were playing. Of course at the time people tried to describe why someone might buy a NFT as being some vague other buzzword laden reason, probably because the game ends sooner if everyone knows everyone else is also just hoping to flip it for a profit.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
                                          This post did not contain any content.
                                          T This user is from outside of this forum
                                          T This user is from outside of this forum
                                          taokan@sh.itjust.works
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #30

                                          People are still paying over 100k for a bitcoin. Which in my opinion, is equally absurd and doomed to fail. Like yea, if you bought one for 2 dollars and turned it into 100k you won investing and maybe established generational wealth. But the same could be said if you managed to catch the windfall of NFTs, it doesn’t change the fact that it’s stupid to assign billions of dollars in value to a global game of guess the number.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          6
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • All Topics
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups