Oh Jesus he is cooked

This is literally the first instruction God gives Adam and Eve. Do not eat the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Do not develop an independent sense of morality. What God says is the right thing at that time, and don’t you dare contradict him.

It’s not that it’s a bad translation, they CHANGED it in the 40s to remove the pedophilia and make it homosexuality. There is actually a book in the Bible that celebrates two gay men living a happy life.

That’s crazy though, because a large portion of them are also gay

Still missing the point that he is free to read and believe anything he likes, but a book of ancient mythology shouldn’t have any influence at all in developing 21st century social/political policy.

Ultimately, that is going to be the final outcome of his argument - either follow ALL the Bible’s demands, or follow none of them - but that’s too many steps for MAGAs. The answer is simple: It’s in the 1st Amendment. If they want to know more, they can go get a real education. It’s time to stop coddling these ignorant traitors.

“The best government is a benevolent tyranny tempered by an occasional assassination.”

• Voltaire

molesting children is a sin

Nowadays that’s a prerequisite if you want to be a republican politician.

“I love uneducated people”

Image not loading

That would keep things consistent with the apparent rule that conservatives must act opposite of what the bible says.

First it discourages molesting kids. RNC buzzkill.

Then while they’re using abortion as a successful wedge issue and mechanism of control, the Bible is over here giving instructions on how to give abortions to unfaithful women.

Then there are so many groups to hate…

And SO many desperate poor people to ignore or actively push out of view…

I probably don’t need to go on.

And yet they could not have possibly known that eating the fruit was bad until after they did, further proving God is just a sadist.

I didn’t know I could watch the same piece of shit get murdered twice, but here we are.

holy shit, stop he’s already dead, you don’t need to keep going.

Charlie was not doing debates. He was a propagandist. What he did was performing in the shape of a debate, in front of an audience to spread his agenda, and he was very good at that. If you scrutinize his “debates” in terms of logic soundness or other things good arguments would have, they don’t stand a chance. But that was not the point, nor would it matter.

I think his debates were actually very well done. It’s just that debates are not a good format to find truth. Charlie was one of the best at debates. Saying all that, we all should be better at being on other platforms and sniping these clips to highlight the hypocrisy and bullshit. I’m absolutely convinced that right wing groups convinced all of us to abandon all other social media so they can spread their ideas easier

Ha ha!

Cremated, even

Though this is hilariously funny, this is the list basic argument against just about any religion, the cherry picking, and I’m still waiting for a fucking answer. Why doesn’t Charlie burn himself to death? I mean, I can imagine that that hole in his neck makes that hard to do for him right now, but why doesn’t he? Why doesn’t every Christian out there burn and stone themselves to death for their continuous sinning?

Or if not, you know, admit that they’re plain wrong about their entire view on life?

Charlie Kirk would have called Jesus a communist.

Depends on what you think debate is, I guess. After posting my comment I did realize people probably conceptualise “debate” differently. If you think debate is just a form of performance to influence people’s ideas, then sure. But if you think debate should be a form of intellectual conversation, a collaboration between two disagreeing parties in order to find truth, then what Charlie is doing couldn’t be further from that.

Voltaire never said that.