Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • All Topics
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Caint logo. It's just text.
  1. Home
  2. The Caint Lock-In
  3. Lemmy Shitpost
  4. How many hands long do they get?

How many hands long do they get?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
lemmyshitpost
107 Posts 60 Posters 5 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
    This post did not contain any content.
    I This user is from outside of this forum
    I This user is from outside of this forum
    ironfacebuster@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by
    #71

    To be fair it does help put into perspective how much of an animal (in this case deer) would make up as a burger

    I prefer measuring in football field turf rolls though

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • X xistera@lemmy.dbzer0.com

      But isn’t it very British to take everyone else’s shit and claim it as their own?

      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      wrote last edited by
      #72

      Only if it’s something really old and they can put it in a museum.

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • B berengaria_of_navarre@lemmy.world

        You Malaysian?

        BeeegScaaawyCrippleH This user is from outside of this forum
        BeeegScaaawyCrippleH This user is from outside of this forum
        BeeegScaaawyCripple
        wrote last edited by
        #73

        nah i just know a good time when i see it. played soccer (as I’m statesian) for ten or so years, but my team started absolutely dominating the local rec league when we’d start and end every practice with 15 minutes of sepak takraw.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
          This post did not contain any content.
          R This user is from outside of this forum
          R This user is from outside of this forum
          razzazzika@lemmy.zip
          wrote last edited by
          #74

          Yeah but the 800 hamburgers are including bones, how many legit venison burgers could you make out of a average deer?

          K 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • D damage@slrpnk.net

            Most of the stuff you interact with daily is much more easily measured in feet and inches vs meters and centimeters

            Hard disagree. The centimeter is the best measurement there is for everyday stuff, you can easily express both round values or weird ones, and don’t need to switch between two scales as you do with feet and inches (and the stupid fact that there’s 12 inches in a feet, wtf). Meters are for distances.

            (this ignores decimeters, but I’ve literally never seen anyone use decimeters in my entire life)

            BECAUSE THE METRIC SYSTEM IS DECIMAL AND YOU DON’T NEED STUPID CHANGES BETWEEN UNITS, MOST PEOPLE JUST SAY TEN CENTIMETERS!

            Celsius is more objective, but when dealing with the standard sorts of temperatures humans are generally concerned with, Fahrenheit gives you more granularity within that range.

            If you’re measuring ambient temperature, 99% of the time being more precise than 1°C is pointless, in a room you may have more variance than that from a corner to another, same goes for outside. For things where you need better precision you sure as hell wouldn’t be using the imperial system, and you could instead take advantage of this neat trick called DECIMALS.

            Edit: addendum for everyday convenience: buying shit at the supermarket. The label expresses price per kilo but the packaging is in grams? You don’t even need to think about it. Drinks? They can even mix litres and kilos, no problem, the difference would be below negligible.
            Here in Italy we usually ask for meat cuts in “etti”, aka hecto grams aka 100grams, so I look at a cut, I see it’s 35€/kg, I ask for 3 etti, immediately know it’ll be 10.5€ (ALSO BECAUSE SALES TAX IS INCLUDED ON THE LABEL FFS)

            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            StrongHorseWeakNeigh
            wrote last edited by
            #75

            No, actually 12 inches in a foot goes hard. base 12 >>>>> base 10

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
              This post did not contain any content.
              C This user is from outside of this forum
              C This user is from outside of this forum
              chiliedogg@lemmy.world
              wrote last edited by
              #76

              The English measure weights in stone.

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              8
              • A acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org

                the more metric the better. in that regard, the UK is better than the US. of course, both are inferior to any other country which only uses the metric system

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                StrongHorseWeakNeigh
                wrote last edited by
                #77

                Why do you guys have so much identity tied up in the metric system

                A 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • robocall@lemmy.worldR robocall@lemmy.world

                  I guess the silver lining for the British is they have more familiarity with both types of measurements than the purests.

                  obi@sopuli.xyzO This user is from outside of this forum
                  obi@sopuli.xyzO This user is from outside of this forum
                  obi@sopuli.xyz
                  wrote last edited by
                  #78

                  Except they only know the amounts/frame of references for the specific things they’re used to, so it’s not like they can do the conversion any better than the rest of us. Canadians have a similar (though different) system as well.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C chiliedogg@lemmy.world

                    The English measure weights in stone.

                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    Javi
                    wrote last edited by
                    #79

                    Actually we use both. For example, body weight is (traditionally) stone and lbs, but parcel weight is usually kg.

                    The same is true for length; height in feet, but stuff like room measurements in cm.

                    I think the only area where we’re actually consistent is traveling distance? All signs and gauges are in Mph rather than Km/h. In fact the only time I can think of someone talking about distance in kilometres, is to do with sports (IE a 5k/10k running event).

                    A M 2 Replies Last reply
                    3
                    • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
                      This post did not contain any content.
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      stoly@lemmy.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #80

                      It was an international group that met in France that created the metric system.

                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                      18
                      • S StrongHorseWeakNeigh

                        Why do you guys have so much identity tied up in the metric system

                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #81

                        misses the point completely

                        it’s not about identity, it’s just fucking weird to meassure length in bananas, volume in how much water the puddle on your street contains, or temperature in how hot the inside of your asshole is on two different days

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • A acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org

                          misses the point completely

                          it’s not about identity, it’s just fucking weird to meassure length in bananas, volume in how much water the puddle on your street contains, or temperature in how hot the inside of your asshole is on two different days

                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          StrongHorseWeakNeigh
                          wrote last edited by
                          #82

                          Says I miss the point and then straw mans an entire system of measurement. Seems like you’re just a little too invested in the metric system.

                          A 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • D damage@slrpnk.net

                            Most of the stuff you interact with daily is much more easily measured in feet and inches vs meters and centimeters

                            Hard disagree. The centimeter is the best measurement there is for everyday stuff, you can easily express both round values or weird ones, and don’t need to switch between two scales as you do with feet and inches (and the stupid fact that there’s 12 inches in a feet, wtf). Meters are for distances.

                            (this ignores decimeters, but I’ve literally never seen anyone use decimeters in my entire life)

                            BECAUSE THE METRIC SYSTEM IS DECIMAL AND YOU DON’T NEED STUPID CHANGES BETWEEN UNITS, MOST PEOPLE JUST SAY TEN CENTIMETERS!

                            Celsius is more objective, but when dealing with the standard sorts of temperatures humans are generally concerned with, Fahrenheit gives you more granularity within that range.

                            If you’re measuring ambient temperature, 99% of the time being more precise than 1°C is pointless, in a room you may have more variance than that from a corner to another, same goes for outside. For things where you need better precision you sure as hell wouldn’t be using the imperial system, and you could instead take advantage of this neat trick called DECIMALS.

                            Edit: addendum for everyday convenience: buying shit at the supermarket. The label expresses price per kilo but the packaging is in grams? You don’t even need to think about it. Drinks? They can even mix litres and kilos, no problem, the difference would be below negligible.
                            Here in Italy we usually ask for meat cuts in “etti”, aka hecto grams aka 100grams, so I look at a cut, I see it’s 35€/kg, I ask for 3 etti, immediately know it’ll be 10.5€ (ALSO BECAUSE SALES TAX IS INCLUDED ON THE LABEL FFS)

                            I This user is from outside of this forum
                            I This user is from outside of this forum
                            impound4017@sh.itjust.works
                            wrote last edited by
                            #83

                            Fair. I’ll acknowledge I’m biased here in retrospect. In particular, I’ve realized my argument for Fahrenheit (increased granularity) is directly contradictory to my argument against centimeters (too much granularity). Indeed, my view (however poorly conveyed) was that imperial units of length measurement, and the foot in particular, lend themselves to day to day estimation of size, as meters require estimation with fractions/decimals and centimeters require estimation in quantities too large to be reasonably accurate, so I was of the view that the lack of decimeters in common usage was a problem, but you make a good point that this is a fundamentally flawed assumption. After all, if you’re familiar with metric already, it’s not particularly difficult to just say ‘10cm’ and estimate in relation to tenths of a meter.

                            Well argued, and certainly more impassioned than my tepid defense of imperial. Consider me convinced; I’m switching teams lol.

                            D 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • R Rothe

                              It is not best for “human related” issues at all, imperial is pretty bad for those as well, but because you have grown up with it it seems so to you.

                              I This user is from outside of this forum
                              I This user is from outside of this forum
                              impound4017@sh.itjust.works
                              wrote last edited by
                              #84

                              Yeah, I’m realizing this is just a bias toward familiarity on my part. There’s several bad assumptions that I made in there which I hadn’t really given too much thought; bad practice on my part, I’ll admit.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • O ourkaos@lemmy.today

                                Don’t forget that distance is somehow different on water, though.

                                P This user is from outside of this forum
                                P This user is from outside of this forum
                                prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
                                wrote last edited by
                                #85

                                Don’t forget to thumb your nose at the Americans for using these systems you made up in almost the same way you guys do, just a different mixture.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • launcheskayaks@lemmy.worldL launcheskayaks@lemmy.world

                                  Shout-out to horses. They’re measured in hands (4 inches) but ONLY up to their shoulder. The neck, head, and ears don’t count towards their height.

                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                                  prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #86

                                  Well, it is called shoulder height.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S stoly@lemmy.world

                                    It was an international group that met in France that created the metric system.

                                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                                    armchairace1944@discuss.online
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #87

                                    The British didn’t even begin to adopt the metric system until in the last third of the 20th century or so, and even then thr transition was not immediate.

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    8
                                    • J Javi

                                      Actually we use both. For example, body weight is (traditionally) stone and lbs, but parcel weight is usually kg.

                                      The same is true for length; height in feet, but stuff like room measurements in cm.

                                      I think the only area where we’re actually consistent is traveling distance? All signs and gauges are in Mph rather than Km/h. In fact the only time I can think of someone talking about distance in kilometres, is to do with sports (IE a 5k/10k running event).

                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      armchairace1944@discuss.online
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #88

                                      In Canada, which transitioned to metric in the 70s and 80s, people’s height are still measured in feet in casual conversation. Weights for groceries still often have lbs and kgs with them.

                                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • A aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                                        Only if it’s something really old and they can put it in a museum.

                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        armchairace1944@discuss.online
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #89

                                        Or words from another language.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • K knowone

                                          And the size of your land in acres/hectares. And a lot of ingredients in cups (which has never been a set amount in the UK since its beginning). And distance sometimes in yards

                                          joel_feila@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          joel_feila@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          joel_feila@lemmy.world
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #90

                                          At least area in acres does avoid the issue of 10 square unit. Does that a 10 by 10 square or a square with a Total area of 10?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • All Topics
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups